Phillip Meilinger interview about his military history and lessons book “Thoughts on War” (University Press of Kentucky, 2020)

Phillip Meilinger interview about his military history and lessons book “Thoughts on War”

Check out this book here   https://amzn.to/2R2Bu24

Interview Timeline

Phillip Meilinger has spent decades both in the military as an Air Force officer and teaching military history and issues in staff and war colleges. He’s written numerous essays on military history and he’s collected a number of his essays and reexamined them for this book. We spoke about the book and [subjects] history ranging from Ancient Rome, to Clausewitz, to the US Civil War and on through to World War Two and beyond.

(THE AUDIO PLAYER IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE POST.)

0:40 – Philip talks about having been a pilot for 30 years and what prompted him to write a book on war.

3:58 – Philip talks about covering ancient to modern warfare in the book.

5:18 – Philip talks about the influence about von Clausewitz on military colleges.

8:03 – Philip talks about Clausewitz’ idea of the bloody battle.

12:11 – Philip talks about how the book reassesses past battles and the impact of air power on war. He also addresses policy in warfare.

18:01- Philip talks about how to make major changes in American doctrine and military policy.

21:08 – Philip talks about the effect of nuclear weapons on waging war.

23:57 – Philip talks about the information age and non-state actors.

27:41 – Philip talks about whether Chinese and Russian military activities are a new kind of warfare.

31:56 – Philip talks about how doctrine does not need to be changed but rather a different approach is needed.

36:01 – Philip talks about raids and punitive actions in modern war.

39:55 – Philip talks about the use and effect of strategic bombing.

44:35 – Philip talks about the budgets for aircraft carriers and new generation jets.

47:58 – Philip talks about balancing the US force and defense spending.

50:20 – Philip talks about how he put the book together.

52:00 – Philip talks about how much the US military was involved in politics in American history.

59:06 – Philip talks about how there was not a unity of command in WWII Europe among the allies.

1:00:34 – Philip talks about air intelligence during WWII.

1:04:13 – Philip talks about the Army Air Corps in WII and a book he wrote on a misconception about their status within the Army.

Links of interest

https://amzn.to/2R2Bu24

https://www.kentuckypress.com/9780813178899/thoughts-on-war/

Contact Information

For more “Military History Inside Out” please follow me at www.warscholar.org, on Facebook at warscholar, on twitter at Warscholar, on youtube at warscholar and on Instagram @crisalvarezwarscholar. Or subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Spotify Please see historyrabbithole.com for a list of my dozen or so blogs and podcasts. You’re sure to find something you like.

Guests: Phillip Meilinger

Host: Cris Alvarez

Tags: 

Books, audio interviews, author, podcast, University Press of Kentucky, General military history, United States,

Check out this book here   https://amzn.to/2R2Bu24

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Military History Inside Out banner

Geoffrey Plank interview about his 15th to 19th centuries military history book “Atlantic Wars” (Oxford University Press, 2020)

Geoffrey Plan military historyGeoffrey Plank interview about his 15th to 19th centuries military history book “Atlantic Wars”

Check out this book here   https://amzn.to/3j22eMb

Interview Summary

Geoffrey Plank has been a historian for many years focusing on Nova Scotia, Quakers, and now military history. He’s written an expansive review of warfare across the Atlantic from the 15th to 19th centuries. We talked about this period, the book, and the immense impact the slave trade had on the formation of the nations along the Atlantic seaboard and on warfare.

(THE AUDIO PLAYER IS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE POST.)

0:40 – Geoffrey explains how he ended up writing an expansive book on Atlantic Wars.

2:02 – Geoffrey explains how he organized the book since it covers so much time and countries.

3:16 – Geoffrey talks about warfare at sea.

5:24 – Geoffrey addresses the idea of democracy and piracy.

7:14 – Geoffrey explains why he started the book in the 15th century.

8:53 – Geoffrey explains why he ended the book at the Age of Revolution.

11:37 – Geoffrey addresses the North Africans raiding Europe.

13:17 – Geoffrey talks about the shift to larger sailing vessels.

16:18 – Geoffrey talks about indigenous populations involvement in the Atlantic war at sea.

18:32 – Geoffrey talks about the war on land around the Atlantic basin and the involvement of indigenous populations.

21:27 – Geoffrey talks about the West African coast.

23:11 – Geoffrey talks about military forces in West Africa.

24:11 – Geoffrey talks about the North and South Atlantic.

26:09 – Geoffrey talks about the development of racism in this period.

30:24 – Geoffrey talks about how often whole colonies were evacuated from the New World to the Old. He also addresses the connection between the slave trade and military operations.

34:40 – Geoffrey talks about the meeting between African slaves and indigenous Americans.

36:38 – Geoffrey talks about a millenarian religious movement.

38:40 – Geoffrey talks about how he did his research.

43:09 – Geoffrey talks about including all of North America within the Atlantic World.

45:20 – Geoffrey talks about the importance of military history in the Atlantic World.

47:46 – Geoffrey talks about galleys being used to block forts in the Caribbean.

50:17 – Geoffrey talks about how rough the lives of sailors were in this period.

54:40 – Geoffrey talks about the role of Central and Eastern Europe in the Atlantic World.

Links of interest

https://amzn.to/3j22eMb

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/atlantic-wars-9780190860455?cc=us&lang=en&

Contact Information

For more “Military History Inside Out” please follow me at www.warscholar.org, on Facebook at warscholar, on twitter at Warscholar, on youtube at warscholar and on Instagram @crisalvarezwarscholar. Or subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | Spotify Please see historyrabbithole.com for a list of my dozen or so blogs and podcasts. You’re sure to find something you like.

Guests: Geoffrey Plank

Host: Cris Alvarez

Tags: Books, audio interviews, author, academic, podcast, Oxford University Press, age of sail, American history,  General military history, 19th century war, 18th century war, Renaissance warfare, Naval Warfare, Slavery history, native american, indigenous peoples,

Check out this book here   https://amzn.to/3j22eMb

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Military History Inside Out banner

Alan Covey interview – Spanish wars of conquest – Inca Apocalypse (Oxford University Press, 2020)

Spanish wars of conquest – An interview with Alan Covey about his new book Inca Apocalypse published by Oxford University Press. The book discusses the Spanish conquest of the Incas. Check out the book here https://amzn.to/2EAvVFj

How did you become interested in studying and writing on the subject of your book?

The Spanish conquest of the Incas has always been an important aspect of the work that I do in the Andes.  It lies between the two lines of evidence that I work with:  prehistoric archaeology and colonial archival documents.  The conquest story stands apart from those two records, and the Spanish chronicles that provide the most vivid detail aren’t always easy to line up with the other evidence, so I was always a little intimidated about trying to work them all together.

What is the book about and what major themes do you focus on?

The book features the religious worldview of the Incas and Spaniards, presenting the conquest of the Andes as a drawn-out transformation that could be interpreted as the end of the world, or the start of a new era.  I focus on the ways that the Inca and Spanish empires were both engaged in building civilizations, and how the Spanish conquest was only possible with indigenous support.  Even though most of the Incas became Christians and supported the Spanish crown, it took decades for the Spaniards to establish dominance over much of what remained of the Inca world.

Did any of the evidence you found address whether either the Spaniards or Incas were surprised to have discovered each other?  In other words, in their respective worldviews did either expect a cataclysmic clash of civilizations at some point as their empires grew?

The Spaniards were probably less surprised to encounter the Incas than the other way around.  When Columbus sailed, he thought he would reach the Mongol Empire and seek an alliance against Spain’s Muslim enemies, and in the 40 years that followed, Spaniards recognized that many native societies had hereditary leaders who could be quite powerful.  Pizarro sailed south from Panama to follow the rumor of a wealthy lord living just beyond where other Spaniards had explored.  The Incas probably expected that their world would end in natural disasters (earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanoes) rather than a foreign invasion.

What did you find to be the biggest culture clashes between the two empires?  Both obviously were ready to engage in war to protect themselves but were there approaches that stood in stark contrast to each other?

Although there were a lot of ways that the two empires were alike, there were also important ways that they differed, which created misunderstandings about each other.  For example, the Spaniards thought that the Pope had granted them dominion over half of the world, so they felt comfortable taking food and clothing and native porters from the communities they passed through.  The Incas saw them as a lawless men who didn’t know the land or even how to eat properly, and when the Spaniards ate Inca food and drank Inca beer, it signaled that they were Inca subjects, rather than the other way around.  As Spaniards and Andean lords worked to forge alliances and gain the greatest advantage as the world changed, their interactions could be ambiguous, interpreted in different ways by European and Andean people.  When it came to fighting, the Incas had shown that they were capable of brutal campaigns that relied on shock troops and violent retribution to bring frontier peoples in line.  The Spaniards didn’t fight by the same rules–they attacked without warning, tortured and burned their allies, and brought new weapons to the battlefield (like horses and firearms).  Over time, native people acquired those weapons and learned to fight against them successfully, and they learned guerilla tactics that worked when Spaniards were few in number and in remote places.

Were the smaller groups that had been previously conquered by the Incas ready to turn against them and why?  Or were the Incas seen as the better alternative to the new Spanish Empire?

The Inca civil war that was wrapping up when Pizarro went into the Andean highlands had forced local lords to choose sides, and Atahuallpa (the victorious Inca prince) had passed through the north Pacific coast where Pizarro arrived just months earlier, killing local people and taking their women.  Atahuallpa’s captains had occupied Cuzco, the Inca capital, where they wiped out some royal families and declared an intent to force the nobility to migrate to Quito.  And there were provinces that had ceased to pay Inca tribute during the war, which Atahuallpa planned to visit and punish.  So the Spaniards turned up on a landscape where lots of Andean people were either looking for revenge, trying to survive, or hoping to maintain newfound independence.  The Spaniards didn’t seem like an especially formidable force when it came to fighting across the entire Andean region, but they were dangerous and violent, and when they offered to fight for native lords, or to protect them, it was an appealing offer.

What resource materials or archives did you primarily use for your research?

To discuss the Inca Empire and its claims to civilize the Andes, I used recent archaeological evidence alongside colonial descriptions of the Inca world.  For other parts of the book, I used published chronicles, as well as a large body of unpublished manuscripts from libraries and archives in South America and Europe.  I also consulted scholarly studies of literature that was beyond my own expertise.

What did you discover in your research that most surprised you?

I think the thing that surprised me most was how much the first-hand descriptions differ from the popular versions of the story that have been published in recent years.  One theme that really stood out was how Pizarro and his allies knowingly violated the terms that they had agreed to with royal officials, and how the Spanish crown had to spend decades trying to figure out how to rein in unruly conquistadores–often with the Incas and other Andean lords as their allies.

Was there a particularly difficult issue to research because of lack of information or access to information?

Probably the biggest challenge to assembling this book was the sheer scale of documents and other evidence that could be used for a big-picture story like the one I wanted to tell.  As a social scientist, I went into the project trying to bring in as much evidence as possible, but I realized that I could fill a book (and more) just with a bibliography of publications and archival manuscripts.

Did you have any difficulties in finishing or publishing and how did you overcome those?

I was fortunate to have support from the University of Texas to devote a semester to writing, which allowed me to build a momentum that I was able to keep for the rest of the project.  My wife, who is also a professor, was really supportive and patient at times when the project required more time and focus.  The folks at Oxford University Press were really accommodating, and I felt like I had room to write the book that needed to be written.

What is your current or next writing project?

Right now, I am in the early stages of a project that builds on some of the things I learned writing Inca Apocalypse.  The Incas became an important point of debate among early modern Europeans, and I am working on a book that explores how representations of the Incas evolved as Europeans moved out of medieval modes of thought, through the Enlightenment, and into the theories that drive the social sciences today.

Where can people find you online?

I don’t do social media, so my page at the University of Texas is the best place to keep up with my work.

Biographical information

Name:  Professor Alan Covey

Bio:  AB Dartmouth College (1996), PhD University of Michigan (2003), postdoctoral training at the American Museum of Natural History.  I’ve held tenure at Southern Methodist University and Dartmouth College before coming to my present position.

Position and specialty:  Professor of Anthropology

Affiliation:  University of Texas at Austin

Project/work being discussed:  Inca Apocalypse

Links of interest

Check out the book here https://amzn.to/2EAvVFj

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/inca-apocalypse-9780190299125?cc=us&lang=en&

https://liberalarts.utexas.edu/anthropology/faculty/rc39628

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.